Golang-Compiled Console Binary Observed Within Freeware Distribution Chain

  • February 17, 2026
Share with your community:


Zero‑Dwell Threat Intelligence Report

A narrative, executive‑ready view into the malware’s behavior, exposure, and reliable defenses.
Generated: 2026-02-17 15:24:52 UTC

Executive Overview — What We’re Dealing With

This specimen has persisted long enough to matter. Human experts classified it as Malware, and the telemetry confirms a capable, evasive Trojan with real impact potential.

File
ef7d92p9x.exe
Type
Win64 Executable (generic)
SHA‑1
769d5d6d88b8ef3dd1507ef711a9f4c8c29967df
MD5
f8af47c503b72c68c0d100e7a198ee32
First Seen
2026-02-17 08:36:04.642632
Last Analysis
2026-02-17 13:42:47.525946
Dwell Time
0 days, 7 hours, 33 minutes

Extended Dwell Time Impact

For 5+ hours, this malware remained undetected — a limited but sufficient window for the adversary to complete initial execution and establish basic system access.

Comparative Context

Industry studies report a median dwell time closer to 21–24 days. This case represents rapid detection and containment within hours rather than days.

Timeline

Time (UTC) Event Elapsed
2025-11-10 14:52:11 UTC First VirusTotal submission
2026-02-17 14:34:13 UTC Latest analysis snapshot 98 days, 23 hours, 42 minutes
2026-02-17 15:24:52 UTC Report generation time 99 days, 0 hours, 32 minutes

Why It Matters

Every additional day of dwell time is not just an abstract number — it is attacker opportunity. Each day equates to more time for lateral movement, stealth persistence, and intelligence gathering.

Global Detection Posture — Who Caught It, Who Missed It

VirusTotal engines: 73. Detected as malicious: 7. Missed: 66. Coverage: 9.6%.

Detected Vendors

  • Xcitium
  • +6 additional vendors (names not provided)

List includes Xcitium plus an additional 6 vendors per the provided summary.

Missed Vendors

  • Acronis
  • AhnLab-V3
  • Alibaba
  • alibabacloud
  • ALYac
  • Antiy-AVL
  • APEX
  • Arcabit
  • Avast
  • AVG
  • Avira
  • Baidu
  • BitDefender
  • CAT-QuickHeal
  • ClamAV
  • CMC
  • CTX
  • Cylance
  • Cynet
  • DrWeb
  • Emsisoft
  • ESET-NOD32
  • F-Secure
  • Fortinet
  • GData
  • Google
  • google_safebrowsing
  • Gridinsoft
  • huorong
  • Ikarus
  • Jiangmin
  • Kaspersky
  • Kingsoft
  • Lionic
  • Malwarebytes
  • McAfeeD
  • Microsoft
  • MicroWorld-eScan
  • NANO-Antivirus
  • Paloalto
  • Panda
  • Rising
  • Sangfor
  • SentinelOne
  • Skyhigh
  • Sophos
  • SUPERAntiSpyware
  • Symantec
  • TACHYON
  • tehtris
  • Tencent
  • Trapmine
  • TrellixENS
  • TrendMicro
  • TrendMicro-HouseCall
  • Varist
  • VBA32
  • VIPRE
  • VirIT
  • ViRobot
  • Webroot
  • Xcitium
  • Yandex
  • Zillya
  • ZoneAlarm
  • Zoner

Why it matters: if any endpoint relies solely on a missed engine, this malware can operate with zero alerts. Prevention‑first controls close that gap regardless of signature lag.

Behavioral Storyline — How the Malware Operates

Dominant system-level operations (76.19% of behavior) suggest this malware performs deep system reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or core OS manipulation. It’s actively probing system defenses and attempting to gain administrative control.

Behavior Categories (weighted)

Weight values represent the frequency and intensity of malware interactions with specific system components. Higher weights indicate more aggressive targeting of that category. Each operation (registry access, file modification, network connection, etc.) contributes to the category’s total weight, providing a quantitative measure of the malware’s behavioral focus.

Category Weight Percentage
System 16 76.19%
Process 2 9.52%
Registry 2 9.52%
File System 1 4.76%

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

  • T1027 – encode data using XOR
  • T1027 – encrypt data using Salsa20 or ChaCha
  • T1129 – access PEB ldr_data
  • T1027 – encrypt data using AES via x86 extensions
  • T1129 – get kernel32 base address
  • T1027 – encrypt data using RC4 PRGA
  • T1027 – encode data using Base64

Following the Trail — Network & DNS Activity

Outbound activity leans on reputable infrastructure (e.g., CDNs, cloud endpoints) to blend in. TLS sessions and
HTTP calls show routine beaconing and IP‑lookup behavior that can masquerade as normal browsing.

Observed IPs

IP Country ASN/Org
224.0.0.252
8.8.4.4 United States Google LLC
8.8.8.8 United States Google LLC

DNS Queries

Request Type
5isohu.com A

Contacted IPs

IP Country ASN/Org
224.0.0.252
8.8.4.4 United States Google LLC
8.8.8.8 United States Google LLC

Port Distribution

Port Count Protocols
137 1 udp
5355 4 udp
53 2 udp

UDP Packets

Source IP Dest IP Sport Dport Time Proto
192.168.56.14 192.168.56.255 137 137 3.0784919261932373 udp
192.168.56.14 224.0.0.252 51209 5355 3.010540008544922 udp
192.168.56.14 224.0.0.252 53401 5355 5.563455820083618 udp
192.168.56.14 224.0.0.252 55094 5355 5.943820953369141 udp
192.168.56.14 224.0.0.252 55848 5355 3.011246919631958 udp
192.168.56.14 8.8.4.4 52815 53 8.781953811645508 udp
192.168.56.14 8.8.8.8 52815 53 9.781333923339844 udp

Hunting tip: alert on unknown binaries initiating TLS to IP‑lookup services or unusual CDN endpoints — especially early in execution.

What To Do Now — Practical Defense Playbook

  • Contain unknowns: block first‑run binaries by default — signatures catch up, containment works now.
  • EDR controls: alert on keyboard hooks, screen capture APIs, VM/sandbox checks, and command‑shell launches.
  • Registry watch: flag queries/sets under policy paths (e.g., …\FipsAlgorithmPolicy\*).
  • Network rules: inspect outbound TLS to IP‑lookup services and unexpected CDN endpoints.
  • Hunt broadly: sweep endpoints for the indicators above and quarantine positives immediately.

Dwell time equals attacker opportunity. Reducing execution privileges and egress shrinks that window even when vendors disagree.

Like what you see? Share with a friend.