Ransomware Sample Creating Malicious Services For Persistent Execution


Zero‑Dwell Threat Intelligence Report

A narrative, executive‑ready view into the malware’s behavior, exposure, and reliable defenses.
Generated: 2025-12-04 08:32:02 UTC

Executive Overview — What We’re Dealing With

This specimen has persisted long enough to matter. Human experts classified it as Malware, and the telemetry confirms a capable, evasive Trojan with real impact potential.

File
8p8h5wl08.exe
Type
Win32 Executable MS Visual C++ (generic)
SHA‑1
ca0c70a0f7a9b35f20e460745c7bb759da84f083
MD5
f6f9610f61469c71f53370dc9a257c05
First Seen
2025-12-01 14:07:46.445529
Last Analysis
2025-12-01 21:28:47.602181
Dwell Time
0 days, 7 hours, 33 minutes

Extended Dwell Time Impact

For 7+ hours, this malware remained undetected — a several-hour window that allowed the adversary to complete initial compromise and begin early-stage persistence establishment.

Comparative Context

Industry studies report a median dwell time closer to 21–24 days. This case represents rapid detection and containment within hours rather than days.

Timeline

Time (UTC) Event Elapsed
2025-11-20 01:07:30 UTC First VirusTotal submission
2025-12-03 21:12:11 UTC Latest analysis snapshot 13 days, 20 hours, 4 minutes
2025-12-04 08:32:02 UTC Report generation time 14 days, 7 hours, 24 minutes

Why It Matters

Every additional day of dwell time is not just an abstract number — it is attacker opportunity. Each day equates to more time for lateral movement, stealth persistence, and intelligence gathering.

Global Detection Posture — Who Caught It, Who Missed It

VirusTotal engines: 73. Detected as malicious: 69. Missed: 4. Coverage: 94.5%.

Detected Vendors

  • Xcitium
  • +68 additional vendors (names not provided)

List includes Xcitium plus an additional 68 vendors per the provided summary.

Missed Vendors

  • CMC
  • Google
  • SUPERAntiSpyware
  • tehtris

Why it matters: if any endpoint relies solely on a missed engine, this malware can operate with zero alerts. Prevention‑first controls close that gap regardless of signature lag.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

  • T1082 – get hostname
  • T1497.001 – reference anti-VM strings
  • T1543.003 – start service
  • T1543.003 – create service
  • T1569.002 – create service
  • T1083 – get file size
  • T1027 – reference AES constants
  • T1129 – link function at runtime on Windows
  • T1497.001 – reference anti-VM strings targeting VirtualPC
  • T1547.001 – reference startup folder
  • T1543.003 – persist via Windows service
  • T1569.002 – persist via Windows service
  • T1222 – set file attributes
  • T1129 – link many functions at runtime
  • T1012 – query or enumerate registry value
  • T1083 – get common file path
  • T1129 – parse PE header
  • T1083 – check if file exists
  • T1027 – encrypt data using RC4 KSA
  • T1027 – encode data using XOR
  • T1027 – encrypt data using AES

Following the Trail — Network & DNS Activity

Outbound activity leans on reputable infrastructure (e.g., CDNs, cloud endpoints) to blend in. TLS sessions and
HTTP calls show routine beaconing and IP‑lookup behavior that can masquerade as normal browsing.

Hunting tip: alert on unknown binaries initiating TLS to IP‑lookup services or unusual CDN endpoints — especially early in execution.

What To Do Now — Practical Defense Playbook

  • Contain unknowns: block first‑run binaries by default — signatures catch up, containment works now.
  • EDR controls: alert on keyboard hooks, screen capture APIs, VM/sandbox checks, and command‑shell launches.
  • Registry watch: flag queries/sets under policy paths (e.g., …\FipsAlgorithmPolicy\*).
  • Network rules: inspect outbound TLS to IP‑lookup services and unexpected CDN endpoints.
  • Hunt broadly: sweep endpoints for the indicators above and quarantine positives immediately.

Dwell time equals attacker opportunity. Reducing execution privileges and egress shrinks that window even when vendors disagree.

Scroll to Top